Study of the energy deposited per particle
at the mid-rapidity region
(addendum to the report on the analysis of the PMC simulations)
Barbara Wosiek 02/04/00
This is a summary of the analysis of energy deposited per particle at midrapidity. In this study only tracks with nhits > 0 are considered (TH - all tracks, PH - primaries). In addition only tracks with -2 <= eta < 2 are accepted and only those which hit Octagon sensors.
Multiplicities of particles, selected according to
the above requirements are listed in Table I (TH tracks) and in Table II (PH tracks).
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive | 576.28 |
394.10 |
34.15 |
51.39 |
80.91 |
15.73 |
Hijing semi-central | 1632.18 |
1114.32 |
100.85 |
145.20 |
227.91 |
43.90 |
Hijing central | 2599.41 |
1785.30 |
164.21 |
230.86 |
350.74 |
68.30 |
Hijing plasma 15% | 2653.46 |
1870.50 |
161.69 |
220.73 |
335.51 |
65.03 |
Hijing plasma 30% | 2732.87 |
1973.67 |
160.84 |
217.10 |
321.07 |
60.19 |
Hijing HBT | 2595.04 |
1775.92 |
164.59 |
231.47 |
353.98 |
69.08 |
Venus central | 5562.50 |
3859.12 |
509.22 |
412.52 |
658.97 |
122.67 |
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive | 433.14 |
369.24 |
33.90 |
24.20 |
5.76 |
0.04 |
Hijing semi-central | 1231.25 |
1044.55 |
99.82 |
69.24 |
17.44 |
0.20 |
Hijing central | 1982.69 |
1678.25 |
163.04 |
115.42 |
25.66 |
0.32 |
Hijing plasma 15% | 2067.87 |
1767.26 |
160.29 |
113.47 |
25.56 |
0.29 |
Hijing plasma 30% | 2174.23 |
1873.70 |
159.50 |
115.27 |
25.49 |
0.27 |
Hijing HBT | 1972.00 |
1667.48 |
163.15 |
115.39 |
25.66 |
0.32 |
Venus central | 4441.20 |
3663.93 |
506.33 |
218.18 |
52.68 |
0.08 |
The next Tables contain values of the average energy deposited per hit per particle, <Edep>. The energy deposited was corrected for the angle of incidence and the following 'truncation' was adopted: A. if(Edep > 1000 keV) Edep = 1000 keV.
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive | 182.53 |
123.7 |
167.6 |
454.6 |
193.6 |
743.4 |
Hijing semi-central | 182.63 |
124.2 |
168.2 |
453.9 |
194.7 |
739.2 |
Hijing central | 180.58 |
124.2 |
164.4 |
444.4 |
192.5 |
741.9 |
Hijing plasma 15% | 176.17 |
123.7 |
167.5 |
441.0 |
189.6 |
738.7 |
Hijing plasma 30% | 171.18 |
123.4 |
166.1 |
433.4 |
187.4 |
719.4 |
Hijing HBT | 181.70 |
124.7 |
164.2 |
447.6 |
192.6 |
743.0 |
Venus central | 172.38 |
125.8 |
172.8 |
431.4 |
187.4 |
683.0 |
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive | 128.3 |
119.6 |
166.2 |
211.1 |
112.1 |
105.1 |
Hijing semi-central | 129.6 |
120.4 |
167.5 |
218.4 |
113.2 |
154.3 |
Hijing central | 129.7 |
120.6 |
163.7 |
217.8 |
115.0 |
98.8 |
Hijing plasma 15% | 128.9 |
120.1 |
166.5 |
216.4 |
116.9 |
113.7 |
Hijing plasma 30% | 128.4 |
119.8 |
165.1 |
219.3 |
115.3 |
109.1 |
Hijing HBT | 129.9 |
120.8 |
163.1 |
217.4 |
115.3 |
135.2 |
Venus central | 131.9 |
122.3 |
172.2 |
204.1 |
115.7 |
101.8 |
There are differences (Table III) in <Edep> up to about 5%
as compared to central Hijing events, and also ratios of TH/PH (see Table I and II) differ
up
to about 5%. For 'plasma 30%' and central Venus both these effects would cause
underestimation of the multiplicity by about 9% (~5% for 'plasma 15%') if reconstructed
with the parameters derived from central Hijing events.
<Edep> obviously is very sensitive to the applied truncation. So now we
change it to the one that I believe is used in the present reconstruction code:
B. if(Edep > 500 keV) Edep = 500 keV.
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing semi-central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing central | 152.6 |
121.5 |
156.7 |
311.2 |
152.3 |
418.8 |
Hijing plasma 15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing plasma 30% | 147.2 |
120.7 |
157.4 |
305.3 |
149.6 |
407.5 |
Hijing HBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venus central | 149.1 |
123.0 |
164.2 |
302.1 |
149.9 |
391.1 |
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing semi-central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing central | 126.2 |
118.6 |
156.3 |
198.3 |
113.2 |
98.8 |
Hijing plasma 15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing plasma 30% | 124.8 |
117.7 |
156.8 |
199.0 |
113.0 |
109.1 |
Hijing HBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venus central | 128.3 |
120.0 |
163.8 |
188.9 |
114.1 |
101.8 |
With the 'truncation' if(Edep > 500 keV) Edep = 500 keV, the
differences in <Edep> (Table V) are somewhat smaller, the difference in TH/PH is the
same as before (all tracks with hits are accepted) and the final effect would be the
underestimation by about 7.5 % (6.7%) of the multiplicity of primaries with hits at
midrapidity for 'plasma 30%' (central Venus) events if reconstructed with the code tuned
to central Hijing.
C. Hits with Edep <= 1000 keV only I
have also tried to apply the sharp cut at 1000 keV, i.e. only those hits are accepted for
which the Edep <= 1000 keV while those with Edep > 1000 keV are rejected. This of
course leads to loose some tracks (those highly ionizing with only 1 hit per track).
The advantage of this cut is, however, that we loose secondaries while primaries remain
intact (at the level of ~0.3%). Tables VII-X summarize the results obtained with this cut.
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing semi-central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing central | 2496.64 |
1782.06 |
163.17 |
186.08 |
334.79 |
30.54 |
Hijing plasma 15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing plasma 30% | 2640.69 |
1970.07 |
159.60 |
176.23 |
306.89 |
27.80 |
Hijing HBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venus central | 5382.92 |
3851.02 |
505.51 |
333.64 |
631.09 |
61.66 |
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing semi-central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing central | 1977.58 |
1676.22 |
162.05 |
113.34 |
25.65 |
0.32 |
Hijing plasma 15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing plasma 30% | 2168.49 |
1871.43 |
158.36 |
112.97 |
25.46 |
0.27 |
Hijing HBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venus central | 4429.11 |
3658.65 |
502.77 |
214.98 |
52.63 |
0.08 |
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing semi-central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing central | 145.51 |
122.32 |
158.76 |
309.25 |
146.43 |
420.27 |
Hijing plasma 15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing plasma 30% | 141.16 |
121.56 |
159.34 |
300.69 |
143.36 |
390.39 |
Hijing HBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venus central | 143.72 |
123.77 |
166.61 |
295.66 |
145.00 |
367.25 |
Sample |
all particles |
pions |
kaons |
protons |
electrons |
others |
Hijing inclusive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing semi-central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing central | 127.25 |
119.34 |
158.33 |
202.96 |
113.71 |
98.79 |
Hijing plasma 15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hijing plasma 30% | 125.84 |
118.56 |
158.87 |
203.02 |
113.59 |
109.14 |
Hijing HBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venus central | 129.34 |
120.80 |
166.22 |
192.08 |
114.29 |
101.82 |
Using this cut and tuning to central Hijing events we obtain midrapidity multiplicities
(of primaries with hits) underestimated by 6.4% (4.9%) for 'plasma 30%' (central Venus)
events.
My plans: