-
Figure
1 - Phobos detectors used in this measurement
-
Figure 2 - Acceptance
of the Phobos detectors
-
Figure 3 -
Illustration of centrality determination
-
Figure 4 - energy
deposition showing effect of merging
-
Figure 5 - Energy loss
versus eta showing effect of corrections for angle
-
Figure 6 - Location of
secondaries and their ratio to primaries
-
Figure 7 -
Illustration of tracklet method
-
Figure 8 -
Illustration of combinatoric background subtraction
-
Figure 9 - Single
event energy deposition
-
Figure 10 - Occupancy
versus pseudorapidity
-
Figure11 - Other
analysis parameters versus pseudorapidity
-
Figure 12 -
Normalized midrapidity dN/deta versus energy for A+A & p+p
-
Figure 13 -
Normalized midrapidity dN/deta versus centrality for Au+Au
-
Figure 14 - Same as
Fig 13 for Cu+Cu
-
Figure 15 - dN/deta
versus eta in centrality bins for Au+Au @ 19.6 GeV
-
Figure 16 - Same as
Fig 15 for 62.4 GeV
-
Figure 17 - Same as
Fig 15 for 130 GeV
-
Figure 18 - Same as
Fig 15 for 200 GeV
-
Figure 19 - dN/deta
versus eta in centrality bins for Cu+Cu @ 22.4 GeV
-
Figure 20 - Same as
Fig 19 for 62.4 GeV
-
Figure 21 - Same as
Fig 19 for 200 GeV
-
Figure 22 -
Illustration of extrapolation methods to find total multiplicity
-
Figure 23 - Total
multiplicity and FWHM versus centrality for Au+Au
-
Figure 24 - Same as
Fig 24 for Cu+Cu
-
Figure 25 -
Normalized total particle multiplicity versus (ln(s))^2
-
Figure 26 -
Normalized total particle multiplicity versus centrality
-
Figure 27 - dN/deta
versus eta in centrality bins for d+Au @ 200 GeV
-
Figure 28 - dN/deta
versus eta for p+p @ 200 & 410 GeV
-
Figure 29 - Extended
longitudinal scaling plot for p+p, Cu+Cu, & Au+Au
