-
Figure
1 - dN/deta vs eta for Au+Au at 3 energies and many centralities
-
Figure
2 - dN/deta vs sqrt(s) for AA and Au+Au at 200 GeV compared to
many theories
-
Figure
3 - Low pT spectra of identified particles in Au+Au at 200 GeV
-
Figure
4 - pbar/p and K-/K+ vs sqrt(s) for AA
-
Figure
5 - pbar/p vs centrality for d+Au at 200 GeV
-
Figure
6 - Elliptic flow vs centrality for Au+Au at 130 and 200 GeV
-
Figure
7 - Elliptic flow vs pT for Au+Au at 200 GeV
-
Figure
8 - R_AA vs pT for 6 centralities in Au+Au at 62.4 and 200 GeV
-
Figure
9 - R_dAu vs pt for 4 centralities in d+Au at 200 GeV
-
Figure
10 - R_dAu vs eta for 4 values of pT in d+Au at 200 GeV
-
Figure
11 - Total multiplicity vs sqrt(s) for AA, pp, and e+e-
-
Figure
12 - Total multiplicity divided by Npart vs centrality for d+Au
at 200 GeV and Au+Au at three energies.
-
Figure
13 - Total multiplicity divided by pp multiplicity vs centrality
in a large variety of systems
-
Figure
14 - dN/deta divided by Npart vs eta for Au+Au at 2 centralities
and 2 energies
-
Figure
15 - dN/deta vs eta for d+Au at 200 GeV at 5 centralities
-
Figure
16 - Same as figure 15 but divided by Npart/2
-
Figure
17 - Same as figure 15 but divided by dN/deta for pp. Also
has inset of integrated value vs centrality for several eta slices
-
Figure
18 - dN/deta divided by Npart for Au+Au compared to dN/deta for
pp and dN/dyT for e+e-, all at 200 GeV
-
Figure
19 - Midrapidity dN/deta divided by Npart vs sqrt(s) for AA and
pp
-
Figure
20 - pbar/p vs sqrt(s) for AA and pp
-
Figure
21a - dN/deta for pp vs eta-ybeam
-
Figure 21b
- dN/dyT for e+e- vs yT-yjet
-
Figure 22 -
dN/deta for pA and d+Au vs eta+/-ybeam
-
Figure 23 -
dN/dy vs y for pions from AA at 6 energies
-
Figure 24 -
dN/deta vs eta+/-ybeam for Au+Au at 3 energies and 2 centralities
-
Figure 25 -
Elliptic flow vs eta for Au+Au at 4 energies
-
Figure 26 -
Same as figure 25 but plotted vs eta+/-ybeam
-
Figure 27 -
HBT parameters vs kT for Au+Au at 2 energies
-
Figure 28 -
Y_YKP vs Y_pipi for AA at 3 energies
-
Figure 29 -
Midrapidity dN/deta vs centrality for Au+Au at 2 energies
-
Figure 30 -
Ratio of two energies plotted in figure 29
-
Figure 31 -
R_PC^Npart vs centrality for 6 pT bins in Au+Au at 200 GeV
-
Figure 32 -
R_AA^Npart and R_PC^Npart vs pT in 4 centrality bins for Au+Au at 2
energies
-
Figure A1 -
Phobos detector overview
-
Figure A2 -
Phobos detector central region blowup
-
Figure B1 -
cartoon of nuclei colliding
-
Figure B2 -
Npart and Ncoll vs b in Au+Au at 200 GeV and Ncoll/Npart vs
centrality for Au+Au at 4 energies
-
Figure C1 -
ZDC vs Paddle mean for Au+Au at 200 GeV
-
Figure C2 -
Histogram of number of paddles hit in data and MC
-
Figure C3 -
Illustration of eta regions used in centrality in Au+Au
-
Figure C4 -
Histograms of various centrality measures in Au+Au
-
Figure C5 -
Four 2D plots illustrating Au+Au centrality method
-
Figure C6 -
Illustration of bias introduced by different centrality measures in
d+Au
-
Figure C7 -
Comparison of data and MC for different centrality measures in d+Au
-
Figure C8 -
Illustration of centrality bins in d+Au
